WASHINGTON D.C. – A potential future Trump administration is reportedly moving to significantly relax federal regulations aimed at phasing down hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), potent greenhouse gases often dubbed “climate superpollutants.” The anticipated move, if implemented, would mark a substantial departure from current U.S. policy and international climate commitments.
HFCs are widely used in refrigeration, air conditioning, and aerosol propellants. While they do not deplete the ozone layer, their global warming potential is thousands of times greater than carbon dioxide over a 100-year period, making their reduction a critical component of global climate action.
Sources familiar with internal discussions indicate that the proposed changes could include delaying scheduled reductions in HFC production and consumption, loosening reporting requirements for manufacturers, and re-evaluating enforcement mechanisms established under existing legislation. The American Innovation and Manufacturing (AIM) Act of 2020, signed into law during the previous Trump administration but largely implemented by the subsequent Biden administration, mandated an 85% phasedown of HFCs by 2036.
A spokesperson for the potential administration, speaking on background, emphasized the need to prioritize American economic interests and alleviate perceived regulatory burdens on businesses.
“Our focus remains on fostering an environment where American businesses can thrive without undue federal interference,” the spokesperson said. “We are looking at all regulations through the lens of economic competitiveness and ensuring that our policies do not place unnecessary costs on consumers or industries, particularly during challenging economic times.”
The Biden administration had embraced the HFC phasedown, including formally ratifying the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol in 2022, an international agreement to gradually reduce HFCs worldwide. The U.S. had previously been a signatory to the amendment but had not ratified it under the first Trump administration.
Widespread Opposition Expected
Environmental organizations and many industry groups have expressed strong opposition to any rollback of HFC regulations, citing both climate impacts and the economic certainty provided by the current phasedown schedule. Businesses that have already invested in HFC alternatives could face market disruption, while those reliant on older HFC technologies might see extended lifespans for less efficient and more polluting systems.
David Doniger, a senior strategist at the Natural Resources Defense Council, warned of severe consequences for climate action.
“Rolling back HFC regulations would be a catastrophic step backward in the fight against climate change,” Doniger stated. “These superpollutants have immense warming potential, and we are already seeing the devastating effects of a warming planet. Undermining the AIM Act would not only harm our environment but also cede American leadership in developing next-generation, climate-friendly technologies.”
The proposed policy shift is expected to face significant legal and political challenges. Environmental groups are likely to challenge any regulatory changes in court, arguing that such actions would violate existing statutory mandates or administrative procedure laws.
The long-term implications of such a move could extend beyond domestic policy, potentially impacting U.S. standing in international climate negotiations and its commitments under the Kigali Amendment, which has been widely lauded as one of the most effective global climate agreements.
Source: Read the original article here.
