WASHINGTON D.C. – Former President Donald J. Trump sparked immediate controversy during an address to military personnel on Tuesday, September 30, 2025, when he referred to a racial slur during his remarks. The incident occurred as Mr. Trump spoke about national unity and the evolution of social discourse at a military installation, prompting a swift wave of criticism and calls for clarification.
The address, which focused on themes of national pride and the challenges facing the armed forces, took an unexpected turn when Mr. Trump reportedly invoked a widely recognized derogatory racial epithet. According to attendees and transcripts reviewed later, the former president made the reference while discussing the importance of leaving divisive language in the past.
“We must leave behind the divisive language of the past, like the ugly ‘N-word,’ which has no place in a unified military or nation,” Mr. Trump reportedly stated to the assembled service members.
The remark drew immediate reactions, with some attendees appearing visibly uncomfortable, while others remained stoic. The context of Mr. Trump’s speech centered on what he described as a need for national cohesion and a rejection of historical prejudices. However, his direct reference to the slur, even in a condemnatory manner, was widely perceived as a misstep by critics.
Shortly after the speech, a spokesperson for Mr. Trump issued a statement clarifying the former president’s intent. “President Trump was unequivocally condemning the use of hateful language and highlighted a specific historical slur to emphasize the progress our nation has made,” the spokesperson said. “His comments were a powerful rejection of racism and division, not an endorsement.”
However, the explanation did little to quell the mounting criticism. Political opponents and civil rights organizations swiftly condemned the remark, regardless of its stated intent.
“Regardless of how it was framed, invoking such a painful and offensive term, especially in front of our diverse military, is reckless and deeply concerning,” stated Senator Maria Rodriguez (D-CA) in a press release. “Leadership means elevating the discourse, not bringing it down to the level of slurs.”
Representatives from several civil rights advocacy groups also voiced their dismay, emphasizing the impact of such language, even when used to condemn. “The power of that word lies in its historical context of oppression and dehumanization,” commented Dr. Evelyn Reed, president of the National Civil Rights Alliance. “To utter it in any public forum, particularly by a former President, can cause immense harm and pain, regardless of the speaker’s perceived intention.”
The Department of Defense has not issued an official statement regarding the incident. However, sources within the military community indicated a sense of unease regarding the comments, particularly given the military’s ongoing efforts to foster an inclusive and respectful environment for all service members.
The incident has reignited ongoing debates about the use of controversial language by public figures and the responsibility that comes with influential platforms. As the fallout continues, political analysts suggest the remark could become a focal point in discussions surrounding the appropriate boundaries of political rhetoric.
Source: Read the original article here.
