The use of glyphosate-based herbicides, widely known by the brand name Roundup, on agricultural crops has been a subject of intense debate for years. However, a prevailing consensus among many international regulatory bodies and scientific organizations affirms that when applied according to label instructions, the pesticide poses no unreasonable risk to human health.
This perspective emphasizes extensive research and decades of regulatory scrutiny that underpin the approvals for glyphosate’s continued use in farming practices globally. Proponents argue that the science supports its safety profile, distinguishing between controlled agricultural application and potential misuse or occupational exposure.
Regulatory Bodies Affirm Glyphosate Safety
Numerous regulatory agencies worldwide have conducted thorough assessments of glyphosate and its safety. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), for instance, has consistently concluded that glyphosate is not likely to be carcinogenic to humans. Their most recent comprehensive review reaffirmed this position, stating that “there are no risks to human health from the current registered uses of glyphosate.”
Similarly, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), after a rigorous peer review process involving experts from all EU Member States, concluded in 2015 that glyphosate is “unlikely to pose a carcinogenic hazard to humans.” This assessment has been upheld in subsequent reviews, with EFSA reiterating that its review did not identify critical areas of concern regarding glyphosate’s impact on human health, animals, or the environment when used correctly.
“Decades of comprehensive research and regulatory assessments globally have consistently found that glyphosate, when used according to label instructions, poses no unreasonable risk to human health or the environment,” noted a joint statement from major national and international food safety and environmental protection agencies regarding the prevailing scientific view.
The Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues (JMPR), an international expert scientific group administered by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO), also concluded that glyphosate is unlikely to pose a carcinogenic risk to humans from exposure through diet. This body evaluates residues of pesticides in food and provides risk assessments.
Scientific Basis and Mechanism of Action
The scientific understanding of glyphosate’s mechanism of action is central to these safety conclusions. Glyphosate works by inhibiting an enzyme called EPSP synthase, which is crucial for protein synthesis in plants but is not found in humans or animals. This distinct mode of action is often cited as a reason for its low toxicity to non-target organisms, including humans, when properly applied.
Studies evaluating acute toxicity, chronic toxicity, genotoxicity, developmental and reproductive effects, and carcinogenicity have informed regulatory decisions. These studies generally show that at typical exposure levels from agricultural use, glyphosate does not present a significant health hazard.
Contextualizing Public Concerns
Despite the broad regulatory consensus, public concern and debate surrounding glyphosate persist, partly fueled by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classification in 2015, which deemed glyphosate “probably carcinogenic to humans” based on “limited evidence” in humans and “sufficient evidence” in experimental animals. However, regulatory bodies like the EPA and EFSA have largely maintained their stance, pointing to a more comprehensive body of evidence and different methodologies in their risk assessments compared to IARC’s hazard identification approach.
Experts and regulatory bodies often emphasize that adhering to application guidelines, including proper dosage, timing, and personal protective equipment, is crucial for minimizing any potential risks. They highlight that residue levels in food are typically well below established safety limits, further supporting the view that consumption of crops treated with glyphosate, when used according to regulations, is safe.
Ultimately, the position that spraying Roundup on crops is fine is rooted in the extensive scientific data and regulatory reviews conducted by authoritative bodies responsible for public health and environmental protection worldwide.
Source: Read the original article here.
