Former President Donald J. Trump announced he has ordered troops to Portland, Oregon, with the explicit directive to protect federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facilities in the city.
The declaration marks a potential return to the controversial federal deployments seen during his presidency, particularly in 2020, when federal agents were sent to Portland to quell protests and protect federal property. That deployment sparked widespread criticism from local officials and civil liberties groups, who accused the Trump administration of overreach and escalating tensions.
Speaking on the matter, Mr. Trump emphasized the necessity of safeguarding federal assets. He stated:
“Federal property, especially facilities critical to our nation’s immigration enforcement, must be protected at all costs. We will not allow a repeat of the chaos and destruction we witnessed before. These troops are there to ensure law and order and the safety of federal employees.”
The previous federal presence in Portland involved agents from agencies like Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and the Federal Protective Service (FPS), under the Department of Homeland Security. The current announcement, specifically mentioning “troops,” could signify a deployment of military personnel, a move that would represent a significant escalation from prior federal interventions and raise immediate questions regarding the Posse Comitatus Act, which limits the use of the military for domestic law enforcement.
Local authorities in Portland have yet to issue an official response to Mr. Trump’s latest declaration. However, past statements from Oregon Governor Kate Brown and Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler have consistently opposed unilateral federal interventions, arguing that they undermine local control and exacerbate civil unrest.
Civil rights advocates are expected to voice concerns over the implications of such an order. Organizations like the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) have previously challenged federal deployments in Portland, citing violations of protesters’ rights and unauthorized actions by federal agents. A new deployment of troops could ignite fresh legal battles and renewed public demonstrations.
The move is anticipated to reignite debate over states’ rights, federal authority, and the role of the military in domestic affairs, especially in the context of political tensions and ongoing discussions about immigration policy.
Source: Read the original article here.